Janice Gould’s reading was very interesting. The pieces she chose to read made sense and I had to wonder why she chose those particular pieces. I enjoyed that she told little explanatory anecdotes to help us understand the context of the poems she chose to share.
While her reading was interesting, Janice Gould’s persona surprised me. Despite that I already knew she was only half Native American and that she grew up in Berkeley, I was expecting someone decidedly more Native American, and less Berkeley. Learning that she is a lesbian and looking at her demeanor and style of dress reminded me much more of the adults that surrounded me when I was growing up than I expected.
I was also surprised by the formatting and context of her poems. Specifically, how introspective her poems really were. On my first reading, I thought her works were meant to deliver more of a message than a feeling. Learning that she wrote her poems and published two of her books around the deaths of her parents made the content of her books seem deeper somehow.
I liked that she played with some forms of poetry simply out of curiosity. She wanted to write the sestina because she thought it would be a challenge to write one that fit into the rules of sestina and had meaning. I though her sestina definitely delivered in terms of both the format and the content, even with her “poetic license” at the end.
Her talk was definitely interesting, and I am glad I got to see her read and hear more about her life, Concow history, and her process.